Which statement is true regarding agency decisions?

The statement that courts can review and potentially overturn agency decisions is accurate because of the concept of judicial review. This principle allows courts to examine the actions of administrative agencies to ensure that they comply with the law, act within their authority, and follow proper procedures. If a court finds that an agency has exceeded its authority, has acted arbitrarily or capriciously, or has failed to adhere to statutory requirements, it can overturn the agency’s decision.

This mechanism is essential for maintaining checks and balances in the government, ensuring that agencies do not abuse their power or operate without adequate oversight. Judicial review serves to protect the rights of individuals and entities affected by agency decisions, promoting accountability and transparency in the administrative process.

The other options do not accurately reflect the relationship between courts and agency decisions; for instance, the idea that courts cannot intervene at all ignores the established legal framework. Similarly, suggesting that courts can only review without the possibility of overturning fails to recognize the significance of judicial authority when agencies act outside their legal boundaries. Lastly, the notion that courts can only postpone decisions undermines the fundamental role of judicial review in upholding legal standards.